The Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) has called on the Federal Government to act after the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, made what it described as a “reckless and violent” remark about a television journalist.

What happened

In a statement issued on 5 April 2026, the NUJ said it was “profoundly shocked and outraged” by a comment attributed to Mr Wike concerning Seun Okinbaloye of Channels Television.

The minister reportedly said:

“If there’s anyway to break the screen, I would have shot him.”

The NUJ described the statement as a direct attempt to intimidate the press and undermine democratic principles in Nigeria.

‘Dangerous signal’ for press freedom

The union said it had initially held back from responding, expecting the minister to apologise or retract the remark.

However, it said the absence of any apology “strongly suggests that the statement was not a momentary lapse but rather a deliberate and intentional act designed to intimidate.”

“This incendiary comment from a high-ranking government official is not only deeply disturbing but also creates a climate of fear for journalists striving to uphold their professional duties,” the NUJ said.

According to the union, such comments risk sending a message that critical reporting could attract hostility or even threats of violence.

Why it matters

Press freedom advocates say statements perceived as threatening can have a chilling effect on journalism, especially in countries where reporters already face political pressure.

The NUJ warned that the safety of journalists is essential to a functioning democracy, adding that any attempt to silence the media must be resisted.

NUJ demands and government response

The union is demanding an “immediate and unreserved apology” from Mr Wike.

It also called on the Federal Government to publicly condemn the comment and take steps to ensure journalists can work without fear.

“It is imperative that the government takes concrete steps to ensure that journalists can perform their essential role without fear of reprisal or harm,” the statement said.

As of the time of publication, there has been no official response from the minister or the federal authorities.

Calls for solidarity

The NUJ urged media organisations, civil society groups and democracy advocates to stand together against what it described as an attack on press freedom.

“The safety and security of journalists are paramount to a healthy democracy,” the union added.

What’s next

Observers say the government’s response will be closely watched as a test of its commitment to media freedom and democratic accountability.

A chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Chief Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, has accused President Bola Tinubu of attempting to weaken opposition parties ahead of Nigeria’s 2027 presidential election.

Mr Eze made the claims in a press statement on Friday, reacting to the removal of key ADC officials from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) portal.

The development involves the delisting of Senator David Mark and former Osun State governor Rauf Aregbesola as the party’s national chairman and secretary respectively.

Mr Eze described the move as politically motivated, alleging that it reflects growing tension as political alignments begin ahead of 2027.

“Even with 33 serving governors in the ruling party, President Tinubu is afraid of a competitive election in 2027,” Mr Eze said.

Why it matters

Nigeria’s next presidential election is still over a year away, but early political manoeuvres are already shaping the landscape.

Disputes over party leadership and INEC’s role in maintaining party records could influence how opposition parties organise and present candidates.

Analysts say internal cohesion within opposition parties will be critical if they are to mount a strong challenge to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Allegations against government and INEC

Mr Eze accused the Tinubu administration of interfering in party affairs through state institutions, including INEC.

He said:

“This latest illegal move of using INEC to destabilise the ADC is politics taken too far.”

He also alleged that the government was attempting to weaken opposition parties broadly, referencing internal challenges within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

“The target and game plan is to ensure a sole presidential candidate across party lines in 2027,” he claimed.

The presidency and INEC have not publicly responded to these specific allegations.

Legal context and Supreme Court ruling

Mr Eze cited a recent Supreme Court judgment to support his argument that INEC should not interfere in internal party matters.

According to him, the ruling in a case involving the PDP emphasised that leadership disputes within political parties are internal issues.

“The Supreme Court has made a pronouncement stopping INEC from interfering in the affairs of political parties,” he said.

Legal experts note, however, that while courts often avoid internal party disputes, INEC still has statutory responsibilities to maintain accurate party records and ensure compliance with electoral laws.

Industry and public perspectives

Political observers say such disputes are not uncommon in Nigeria’s pre-election period.

Some analysts argue that accusations of interference often reflect deeper struggles within parties over leadership and direction.

Others warn that prolonged disputes could weaken opposition coalitions and reduce voter confidence.

Civil society groups have also called for transparency from both political parties and electoral bodies to maintain trust in the democratic process.

What’s next

The ADC has indicated it will continue with its internal political activities despite the dispute.

Mr Eze urged party members to proceed with planned congresses and organisational processes.

Meanwhile, attention is likely to shift to INEC for clarification on the status of party officials and its role in the controversy.

As political activity intensifies, stakeholders are expected to monitor how institutions manage disputes in the lead-up to 2027.

A leading aspirant in the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ondo North, Alexander Oluremi Ajipe, has congratulated Olayide Adelami on his birthday, describing him as a “perfect gentleman” committed to public service.

In a statement he personally signed, Ajipe praised Adelami’s contributions to the development of Ondo State under Governor Lucky Orimisan Aiyedatiwa.

“A perfect gentleman who has continued to contribute his quota immensely to the development of Ondo State.”

Why it matters

The message reflects ongoing political alignments within the APC in Ondo State, particularly as aspirants position themselves ahead of future electoral contests.

Observers say such public endorsements and goodwill gestures often signal loyalty and strategic alliances within party ranks.

Ajipe highlighted Adelami’s “unwavering commitment to public service” and his role in advancing development across key sectors in the state.

“Your dedication, humility and service-oriented approach exemplify the true spirit of leadership that Ondo State is proud of.”

Leadership and public service

Ajipe also commended the deputy governor’s leadership style, noting that it aligns with what he described as the state’s broader development agenda.

He offered prayers for continued strength and wisdom for Adelami.

“May this new age bring you even greater blessings, strength and opportunities to serve our beloved Sunshine State.”

Industry and public perspective

Political analysts say birthday tributes in Nigeria’s political space often go beyond celebration, serving as subtle indicators of alliances and influence.

For constituents, such messages can reinforce public perception of unity within leadership, especially in a politically active state like Ondo.

What’s next

With political activities gradually building ahead of future elections, stakeholders are expected to continue strengthening alliances within party structures.

Ajipe, known for his advocacy in youth empowerment and community development, is considered one of the notable voices in Ondo North’s evolving political landscape.