Environment
Gas Flaring Penalties Hit $646m in 2025 as NGO Warns Policy “Not Working”
An environmental group has urged the Nigerian government to impose a total ban on gas flaring, warning that oil companies are choosing to pay penalties rather than reduce emissions.
The Renevlyn Development Initiative (RDI) said the surge in payments shows existing sanctions are ineffective.
This follows new data from the Nigerian Oil Spill Monitor, which shows oil firms paid an estimated $646 million in gas flaring penalties in 2025, the highest in five years.
Why it matters
Gas flaring, burning off excess natural gas during oil extraction releases harmful emissions that affect public health and contribute to climate change.
Communities in the Niger Delta have long complained about pollution, poor crop yields, and health risks linked to flare sites.
Nigeria has pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2060, but critics say continued flaring undermines that goal.
Rising penalties, rising emissions
The data reveals a complex trend.
While flaring volumes fell between 2020 and 2022, they have risen again in recent years:
2020: 349.3 million SCF
2021: 264.6 million SCF
2022: 230.1 million SCF
2023: 278.3 million SCF
2024: 301.3 million SCF
The highest penalties on record were in 2018, when companies paid $934 million after flaring gas worth $1.6 billion.
“Not a cause for celebration”
RDI Executive Director, Philip Jakpor said the government should not treat the payments as revenue success.
“The increase in payment of the penalties should not be viewed in terms of revenue as the Nigerian government wants us to see it. It should not be a cause for celebration. What it shows is that the oil companies are very comfortable paying what the government portrays as humungous sums rather than saving our environment and people from the toxic emissions”.
He added that the current penalty rate, about $2 per 1,000 SCF remains too low to deter companies.
“For the polluting oil companies the penalties at $2.00 for 1,000 scf still remains a pat on the back… the government has capitulated to a position of financialization of pollution”.
Impact on communities
Jakpor said the real cost is borne by residents living near flare sites.
“Communities living side by side these polluting facilities carry the biggest burdens in form of constant heat, acid rain, poor farm yields, and the health impacts of inhaling methane and other toxic chemicals from the flare sites. That should be the biggest worry of our government instead of so-called revenue”.
Environmental experts have long linked gas flaring to respiratory illnesses, environmental degradation, and reduced agricultural productivity.
Climate targets under scrutin
RDI questioned Nigeria’s commitment to its climate goals, arguing that continued flaring contradicts its emissions targets.
“A genuine and just energy transition must be built on cutting emission at source rather than encouraging the fossil fuels industry to continue business as usual. An end to gas flaring is what we want to celebrate, not increased revenue from penalties”.
Industry and policy perspective
Oil companies typically argue that flaring is sometimes unavoidable due to infrastructure limitations, though regulators have set deadlines to end the practice dating back to 1984.
Government agencies have also defended penalties as part of a broader transition strategy, but critics say enforcement remains weak.
What’s next
Campaigners are calling for stricter enforcement, higher penalties, and investment in gas capture technologies.
Some analysts suggest that without stronger regulation and infrastructure, flaring may persist despite financial sanctions.
Environment
Shell Oil Spill Protest in Bodo: EDEN Demands Accountability Over Environmental Damage
The Environmental Defenders Network (EDEN) joined protesters in Bodo, Rivers State, on Monday to demand accountability from oil giant Shell over what campaigners describe as decades of environmental destruction and health risks linked to oil operations in Ogoniland.
The protest coincided with Shell’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) in London, where shareholders gathered to discuss the company’s future strategy and financial performance.
Demonstrators in Bodo said the timing was deliberate — aimed at drawing global attention to the environmental and economic impact of oil spills that have affected the community for years.
Campaigners accused Shell of profiting from crude oil extraction in Bodo while local residents continue to face polluted waterways, damaged farmlands, loss of livelihoods, and worsening health conditions.
Why the Protest Matters
Bodo, an Ogoni community in Rivers State, has long been at the centre of environmental concerns tied to oil exploration in the Niger Delta.
Two major oil spills from Shell-operated pipelines in 2008 severely damaged mangrove forests and aquatic ecosystems in the Bodo Creek area, according to environmental groups and court filings.
The issue later became part of wider concerns documented in the landmark United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report on Ogoniland, published in 2011.
The UNEP report found widespread contamination linked to oil operations and warned that benzene — a cancer-causing chemical — was present in groundwater in some Ogoni communities at levels significantly above World Health Organization standards.
The report recommended emergency clean water provision and a long-term environmental restoration programme.
More than a decade later, activists say many recommendations remain poorly implemented.
EDEN Accuses Shell of Failing to Deliver Cleanup
Speaking during the protest, Sebastian Kpalap, head of EDEN’s Port Harcourt office, said the organisation believes Shell has not adequately addressed the environmental damage in Bodo.
“It is the informed position of EDEN [that] Shell has failed to clean up the spills in Bodo,” he said.
“It is also evident that there is a high death rate in Bodo which could be linked to the destruction wrought on the environment by the operations of Shell.”
Kpalap said the organisation was standing in solidarity with residents to demand “a thorough cleanup of the environment and the urgent commissioning of a comprehensive health audit of the people.”
EDEN Executive Director Chima Williams also criticised delays in providing safe drinking water to affected communities.
“The fact that an emergency measure like provision of portable water has taken more than a decade to deliver speaks volumes of the failure of Shell to take responsibility for the harm it has done to the people,” Williams said.
Community Concerns Over Livelihoods and Health
Residents say decades of oil pollution have affected fishing, farming, and local businesses — the traditional economic backbone of the community.
Environmental advocates argue that prolonged exposure to pollution has also contributed to rising health concerns, though comprehensive public health studies in the area remain limited.
The renewed protest reflects growing frustration among communities in the Niger Delta over the pace of environmental remediation and compensation efforts.
Industry and Public Reactions
Environmental experts say the Bodo case remains one of the most internationally recognised examples of oil pollution in the Niger Delta.
Analysts note that multinational energy companies operating in the region face increasing scrutiny from investors, regulators, and environmental groups over sustainability and corporate responsibility commitments.
What Happens Next?
Campaigners are calling for:
A full environmental cleanup of Bodo Creek
Independent health audits in affected communities
Faster delivery of clean drinking water
Greater transparency from oil companies and regulators
Long-term restoration of damaged ecosystems
The protest adds fresh pressure on Shell as debates continue over environmental accountability and the future of oil-producing communities in the Niger Delta.
Shell had not publicly responded to the latest protest at the time of publication.
Environment
Lagos to Host 11th Noiseless Summit to Tackle Noise Pollution — Registration Open
The Lagos State Environmental Protection Agency (LASEPA) has announced plans to host the 11th edition of its Noiseless Lagos Summit, aimed at tackling increasing noise pollution across the state.
The summit will take place on May 12, 2026, at the Adeyemi Bero Auditorium, starting at 9:00 a.m.
Organisers say the event will bring together stakeholders from government, technology, environmental management and urban planning sectors.
Why it matters
Lagos, one of Africa’s fastest-growing megacities, faces persistent noise challenges driven by traffic, construction, nightlife and industrial activity.
LASEPA said the summit, themed “Advancing Sound Control and Technology in an Emerging Smart City,” will focus on practical solutions to reduce noise levels and improve public health.
Excessive noise exposure has been linked to hearing loss, stress and sleep disruption, making it a growing concern for residents.
Focus on technology and policy
According to LASEPA, discussions will centre on how modern technology and stronger policy frameworks can help manage noise pollution more effectively.
“Advancing Sound Control and Technology in an Emerging Smart City.”
The agency said the summit forms part of its broader campaign to strengthen enforcement of environmental regulations and encourage compliance.
Free hearing tests for participants
As part of the event, organisers will offer free hearing tests to attendees, highlighting the health risks associated with prolonged exposure to high noise levels.
How to attend
Residents, businesses and stakeholders interested in attending the summit are encouraged to register in advance via the official link:
https://forms.gle/Y7RkWqsXu4Gi1xv46
What’s next
The summit is expected to attract policymakers, environmental experts, tech innovators and members of the public.
LASEPA says insights from the discussions will help shape future policies and enforcement strategies aimed at reducing noise pollution across Lagos.
Environment
Nigeria Urged to Enforce Environmental Laws as Pollution Threatens Health, Economy
A professor at Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology has called on governments at all levels in Nigeria to urgently enforce environmental protection laws and increase funding for research, warning that pollution is endangering public health and economic growth.
Pollution ‘permeating every aspect of life’
Delivering the university’s 10th inaugural lecture in Okitipupa, Ilemobayo Ifedayo Oguntimehin said pollutants have “permeated virtually every aspect of the environment.”
He warned that contamination now affects air, water and soil, alongside emerging threats such as nanoparticles, PFAS “forever chemicals” and electronic waste.
“Understanding the nature, sources and impacts of pollutants is crucial for developing effective strategies to protect human health and preserve our planet for future generations,” he said.
Why it matters
Environmental experts say pollution remains a major but under-enforced challenge in Nigeria, contributing to health problems, reduced agricultural productivity and economic losses.
Oguntimehin argued that stronger enforcement of environmental laws could reduce these risks while supporting sustainable development.
He also stressed the need for better monitoring systems and nationwide awareness campaigns to change public behaviour.
Key recommendations
The professor outlined several measures aimed at tackling pollution and improving environmental outcomes:
Transition to a circular economy to reduce waste
Create designated zones for auto-mechanic activities
Mandate planting of pollution-tolerant trees
Strengthen watershed protection
Pilot mannitol spraying on tomato farms to boost yields by up to 60%
Expand collaboration between industry and universities
He also urged citizens to stop indiscriminate waste disposal and adopt waste-sorting practices.
“We have the tools and the economic incentive. What we need now is collective will and urgent action,” he added.
Industry and institutional reactions
In his response, OAUSTECH Vice-Chancellor Temi Ologunorisa described the lecture as “remarkable” and urged policymakers to consider its recommendations.
He also called for increased investment in tertiary education to strengthen research and innovation capacity.
The vice-chancellor acknowledged support from the Ondo State Government under Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, as well as the late former governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu.
Wider perspective
Environmental analysts say Nigeria faces growing pressure to address pollution as urbanisation and industrial activity increase.
Stronger enforcement, they argue, could also improve investor confidence and align Nigeria with global sustainability targets.
What’s next
Stakeholders expect policymakers to review the lecture’s recommendations, particularly around enforcement, research funding and public awareness.
For now, experts say progress will depend on whether authorities translate policy discussions into action.
-
Politics6 days agoOAUSTECH Celebrates Reuben Fasoranti at 100, Hails Legacy of Integrity and Leadership
-
Security4 days agoOyo Police Arrest Suspected Kidnapper, Recover Exhibits After ₦10m Ransom Operation
-
Security7 days agoOyo Police Launch Violent Crime Response Unit, Begin Special Training for 75 Officers
-
Technology7 days agoNigerian Religious Leaders Warn of AI Risks, Demand Ethical Safeguards at Lagos Summit
-
Crime6 days agoOyo Police Rescue US-Based Doctor From Mob Over False Kidnap Alarm, Arrest Three in Separate Gun Operation
-
Business7 days agoBoca Energy Resources Limited Celebrates Mothers Worldwide on Mother’s Day 2026
-
Crime6 days agoLagos Police Arrest Two Suspected ‘One Chance’ Robbers, Recover Tricycle and Phones
-
Business2 days agoSterling Financial Holdings Assets Cross ₦4 Trillion as Profit Surges in Q1 2026

